海归网首页   海归宣言   导航   博客   广告位价格  
海归论坛首页 会员列表 
收 藏 夹 
论坛帮助 
登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 论坛首页 |  排行榜  |  在线私聊 |  专题 | 版规 | 搜索  | RSS  | 注册 | 活动日历
主题: 安氏案例分析(旅游娱乐业):【图】香港迪斯尼的Deal Structure(交易结构)
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归商务           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙
  阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题
作者 安氏案例分析(旅游娱乐业):【图】香港迪斯尼的Deal Structure(交易结构)   
所跟贴 安氏案例分析(旅游娱乐业):【图】香港迪斯尼的Deal Structure(交易结构) -- 安普若 - (1188 Byte) 2005-9-14 周三, 11:49 (12634 reads)
Waage





头衔: 海归上士


加入时间: 2005/08/24
文章: 4
来自: landless
海归分: 1984





文章标题: The key is, what's the net current value and social implication (890 reads)      时间: 2005-9-15 周四, 02:22   

作者:Waage海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com

It's true that from the deal structure, the HK gov. has made a significant extra investment which did not reflect on the equity structure of the joint venture, that is, the investment in infrastructure and that of land.

However, this only means there might be some "unfair" (no necessarily!) INTERNAL allocation between these two parties, which does not mean HK gov. cannot profit from this project. Unless it is in the case of buying shares in public offering, there is no requirement or criterion that capital contribution, cash or in kind, shall must be proportionate to the equity percentage of the parties in a firm. It's a private bargain!

HK gov. might think this is a unique investment opportunity, commercially, or politically, or both. If it thinks the deal can still get it postivie net value, it is ready to assume seemingly "unfair" extra contribution. There is leverage anyway on Disney. If this is is because of the speciaty of the brand of Disney, then it can be said that the Royalties is not 5-10%, but this formal figure plus the extra investment. This might only prove that Disney is a sucessful brand. The point is, in this project, by assuming "unfair" terms, the HK gov. might make more money than it could in a fair transction with other partners!

In addition, as you guys have observed, there is also social/political significance of this project in terms of employment, tax revenue, and tourist attraction. This is far beyond my ability to say anything, but at least it might be one concern behind the project decision.

Anyway, just some simple thinking and look forward to comments and further discussion with you. This is really intersting!



作者:Waage海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com









相关主题
香港吃喝玩乐系列:【图】香港蘇浙同鄉會餐廳(转贴)——我认为香港最好的上海... 海归茶馆 2006-8-21 周一, 23:26
没事找事系列:【漂亮照片】香港迪斯尼开幕庆典上众明星的衣着打扮(转贴)——... 海归茶馆 2005-10-19 周三, 14:51
旅游娱乐业案例分析:无锡统一嘉园被强制拍卖 (转贴) 海归论坛 2006-1-16 周一, 13:47
旅游娱乐业:案例分析:深圳华侨城集团文化产业发展纪实 (转贴) 海归论坛 2004-11-23 周二, 16:20
旅游娱乐业:案例分析:“环球嘉年华” (转贴) 海归论坛 2004-7-15 周四, 05:43
旅游娱乐业:“凯雷案”之外 外资已在文化产业开辟“第二战场” (转贴) 海归论坛 2006-7-01 周六, 16:48
旅游娱乐业:我国五星级大酒店标准简介及上海地区五星级大酒店建安成本分析 (转贴) 海归论坛 2006-2-23 周四, 05:26
旅游娱乐业:黑石27亿美元收购百威英博旗下主题公园部门(转帖) 海归主坛 2009-10-13 周二, 11:40

返回顶端
阅读会员资料 Waage离线  发送站内短信
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归商务           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, 
   热门标签 更多...
   论坛精华荟萃 更多...
   博客热门文章 更多...


海归网二次开发,based on phpbb
Copyright © 2005-2026 Haiguinet.com. All rights reserved.