| 作者 |
 Chinese DVD companies are suing Philips, Sony etc. |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
好像就是那几家厂商嫌4C的专利使用费太高了，不过这真和“反垄断法”有关系吗？Karen是搞法律的，能不能给解释一下？ -- wanderer - (0 Byte) 2005-2-03 周四, 05:36 (332 reads) |
Karen
头衔: 海归上士
加入时间: 2005/01/15
文章: 23
海归分: 1629
|
|
|
作者：Karen 在 海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
Patent pooling itself is legal. It is actually convenient for licensees to negotiate licensing agreements with a single entity instead of with individual patent owners.
However, if a patent pool is anti-competitive in nature, it could violate US anti-trust law ( 反垄断法）. For example, it is illegal to bundle non-essential patents with essential patents, charge unreasonable royalty fees, or have discriminatory licensing policies.
In this case, the Chinese manufacturers are alleging that the 3C fixed floor price of $5/player is unreasonable given the sharp price reduction of DVD players in recent years. Now the patent royalty is approximately 25 per cent of a DVD player's manufacturing cost and the Chinese manufacturers are arguing that the fixed price floor is not competible with the natural market depreciation of DVD technology over time.
作者：Karen 在 海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
|
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, |
|
|
