The unique perspective of sequence of events and strengh of wording in your exposition on Greenspan contributed to my strong arguments.
I may even have some good explanations (they don't have to be and most likely are not going to be rebuttals) once you've compiled and validated Greenspan's mistakes.
I know your collections of Greenspan's words won't dissappoint me. I'm a big fan, not of him, but of what he stands for.
