| 作者 |
 "男人爱貌，女人爱财" 的科学意义[ZT]-“挑剔的雌性、竞争的雄性”是已写入基因的本能，仍然在悄悄地影响着我们的选择 |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
"男人爱貌，女人爱财" 的科学意义[ZT]-“挑剔的雌性、竞争的雄性”是已写入基因的本能，仍然在悄悄地影响着我们的选择 -- XiamenTurtle - (1359 Byte) 2007-10-10 周三, 10:45 (1871 reads) |
Candyheart
[博客]
[个人文集]
头衔: 海归上校
声望: 专家
性别:  年龄: 46
加入时间: 2007/07/27
文章: 3565
海归分: 80053
|
|
|
作者：Candyheart 在 海归酒吧 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
等等snap judgement或thin slice thinking都是被program到人脑里的...被什么program的？嗯，事情就是那么个事情，道理就是这么简单，你自己去看 
不过人之所以“高级”就是能认识到不足和缺陷后加以控制，更好利用 
https://www.amazon.com/blink-Power-Thinking-Without/dp/0316172324
Amazon.com
blink is about the first two seconds of looking--the decisive glance that knows in an instant. Gladwell, the best-selling author of The Tipping Point, campaigns for snap judgments and mind reading with a gift for translating research into splendid storytelling. Building his case with scenes from a marriage, heart attack triage, speed dating, choking on the golf course, selling cars, and military maneuvers, he persuades readers to think small and focus on the meaning of "thin slices" of behavior. The key is to rely on our "adaptive unconscious"--a 24/7 mental valet--that provides us with instant and sophisticated information to warn of danger, read a stranger, or react to a new idea.
Gladwell includes caveats about leaping to conclusions: marketers can manipulate our first impressions, high arousal moments make us "mind blind," focusing on the wrong cue leaves us vulnerable to "the Warren Harding Effect" (i.e., voting for a handsome but hapless president). In a provocative chapter that exposes the "dark side of blink," he illuminates the failure of rapid cognition in the tragic stakeout and murder of Amadou Diallo in the Bronx. He underlines studies about autism, facial reading and cardio uptick to urge training that enhances high-stakes decision-making. In this brilliant, cage-rattling book, one can only wish for a thicker slice of Gladwell's ideas about what blink Camp might look like. --Barbara Mackoff --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
From Publishers Weekly
Starred Review. Best-selling author Gladwell (The Tipping Point) has a dazzling ability to find commonality in disparate fields of study. As he displays again in this entertaining and illuminating look at how we make snap judgments—about people's intentions, the authenticity of a work of art, even military strategy—he can parse for general readers the intricacies of fascinating but little-known fields like professional food tasting (why does Coke taste different from Pepsi?). Gladwell's conclusion, after studying how people make instant decisions in a wide range of fields from psychology to police work, is that we can make better instant judgments by training our mind and senses to focus on the most relevant facts—and that less input (as long as it's the right input) is better than more. Perhaps the most stunning example he gives of this counterintuitive truth is the most expensive war game ever conducted by the Pentagon, in which a wily marine officer, playing "a rogue military commander" in the Persian Gulf and unencumbered by hierarchy, bureaucracy and too much technology, humiliated American forces whose chiefs were bogged down in matrixes, systems for decision making and information overload. But if one sets aside Gladwell's dazzle, some questions and apparent inconsistencies emerge. If doctors are given an algorithm, or formula, in which only four facts are needed to determine if a patient is having a heart attack, is that really educating the doctor's decision-making ability—or is it taking the decision out of the doctor's hands altogether and handing it over to the algorithm? Still, each case study is satisfying, and Gladwell imparts his own evident pleasure in delving into a wide range of fields and seeking an underlying truth.
作者：Candyheart 在 海归酒吧 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
|
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件可以下载文件, |
|
|
-- 