| 作者 |
 ZT: 通俗地讲一下庞加莱猜想是怎么回事 |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
"New Yorker"有篇专文把证明庞加莱猜想主要归功与那个俄犹Perelman,完全否定中国人的贡献 -- jeepguy - (344 Byte) 2006-8-25 周五, 12:09 (707 reads) |
HappyPoorMan
头衔: 海归少将
声望: 教授
加入时间: 2005/08/08
文章: 1134
海归分: 233543
|
|
|
作者：HappyPoorMan 在 海归酒吧 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
New Yorker的文章的作者Nasar和田刚的co-author Morgan都是哥大的教授。整篇文章从开始就是想搞臭Yau。至于两个中国学者的贡献，应该５％－１０％还是有的。
New Yorker的文章的作者麻烦大了。看下面两封信.
>> Date: August 23, 2006 8:36:17 PM EDT
>> Dear Yau,
>>
>> I just returned earlier today from 10 days in Europe, and
>> was out of email contact for the last several days.
>> I am furious, and completely shocked, at what Sylvia Nasar
>> wrote. Her quote of me is completely wrong and baseless. There are
>> other factual mistakes in the article, in addition to those you
>> pointed out.
>> I have left her phone and email messages this evening and
>> hope to speak to her tomorrow at the latest to clear this up. I want
>> her to remove this statement completely from the article. It serves
>> no purpose and contains no factual inxxxxation; I view it as stupid
>> gossip unworthy of a paper like the New Yorker. At the moment, the
>> print version has not appeared and so it might be possible to fix
>> this still.
>> I spent several hours with S. Nasar on the phone talking
>> about Perelman, Poincare, etc but it seems I was too naive (and
>> I'm now disgusted) in believing this journalist would report factually.
>> I regret very much this quote falsely attributed to me
>> and will do whatever I can to have it removed.
>> I will keep you inxxxxed as I know more.
>>
>> Yours, Michael
MIchigan大学讲座教授Smoller教授给New Yorker的信：
Dear Ms Nasar:
First let me say that I have been a subscriber to The New Yorker
since the 1960's; I love the magazine, and read nearly all the
articles every week.
I am also a co-author of Yau's and since 1991, and we have
written 18 joint papers.?Of course, not all of them are major
breakthroughs, but at least 2 of them can be so designated: our 2000
paper which appeared in Nuclear Physics B, and our 2006 paper which
just appeared in the prestigious journal "Communications in
Mathematical Physics". It is extremely rare for mathematicians to get
a paper published in a journal devoted to nuclear physics, and our
2006 paper solves a problem dealing with stability of Black-Holes,
first elucidated by the Princeton physicist John Wheeler in 1957.
These papers ALONE demolish your statement that Yau has had no major
results in the last 10 years. How could you have made such a
statement? Where did you get your information? Didn't you feel a
responsibility to check your facts with other mathematicians??Your
behavior reminds me of the Jason Blair scandal at the New York Times.
Shame on You!
Sincerely yours,
Joel
作者：HappyPoorMan 在 海归酒吧 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
|
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件可以下载文件, |
|
|
