海归网首页   海归宣言   导航   博客   广告位价格  
海归论坛首页 会员列表 
收 藏 夹 
论坛帮助 
登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 论坛首页 |  排行榜  |  在线私聊 |  专题 | 版规 | 搜索  | RSS  | 注册 | 活动日历
主题: [转帖]这个关于GM的文章有些意思,轻松一下吧。
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归商务           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙
  阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题
作者 [转帖]这个关于GM的文章有些意思,轻松一下吧。   
theoretical
[博客]
[个人文集]




头衔: 海归上校

头衔: 海归上校
声望: 院士
性别: 性别:男
加入时间: 2006/10/13
文章: 5521

海归分: 69567





文章标题: [转帖]这个关于GM的文章有些意思,轻松一下吧。 (1722 reads)      时间: 2008-6-04 周三, 14:04
  

作者:theoretical海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com

Toyota and GM decided to have a canoe race on the Missouri River. Both teams practiced long and hard to reach their peak performance before the race.

On the big day, Toyota won by a mile. GM, very discouraged and depressed, decided to investigate the reason for the crushing defeat. A management team made up of senior management was formed to investigate and recommend appropriate action.

Their conclusion was Toyota had 8 people rowing and 1 person steering, while GM had 8 people steering and 1 person rowing.
So GM management hired a consulting company and paid them a large amount of money for a second opinion.

They advised that too many people were steering the boat, while not enough people were rowing. To prevent another loss to Toyota, GM rowing team's management structure was totally reorganized to 4 Steering Supervisors, 3 Area Steering Superintendents and 1 Assistant Superintendent Steering Manager. They also implemented a new performance system that would
give the 1 person rowing the boat greater incentive to work harder. It was called the "Rowing Quality First Program," with meetings and dinners for management and a free pen for the rower. There was discussion of getting new paddles, canoes and other equipment, extra vacation days for practices and bonuses.

The next year Toyota won by two miles.

Humiliated, GM laid off the rower for poor performance, halted development of a new canoe, sold the paddles, and canceled all capital investments for new equipment. The money saved was distributed to the Senior Executives as bonuses and the next year's racing team was outsourced to India.

作者:theoretical海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com









相关主题
凭什么把我质疑抄袭的帖子删了?拿“抄袭”当“引用”的文章继续精华,举报的帖... 众议院 2011-6-14 周二, 23:56
[转帖]不是愚人节的文章,数字0被印度人发现以来的重大发现,千三百年后中国... 海归主坛 2008-3-31 周一, 20:38
[转帖]四年前的一篇文章: 对“印度超越中国论”的思考 海归主坛 2008-2-22 周五, 20:59
[转帖]《人民日报》文章: 群体性疯狂给股市的运行埋下了巨大的风险隐患 海归论坛 2007-4-17 周二, 14:20
[转帖]一个日本人的文章 (3) 海归论坛 2006-7-15 周六, 13:43
[转帖]美国西部: 一次难忘的经历,一组惊艳的景观 生活风情 2017-3-02 周四, 08:36
[转帖] 德系工程师眼中的日本汽车,到底怎么样?(下) 生活风情 2016-8-07 周日, 07:02
[转帖]50种可以在美国抵税的费用,为你省下大笔钱 海归商务 2015-4-26 周日, 09:50

返回顶端
阅读会员资料 theoretical离线  发送站内短信
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归商务           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, 
   热门标签 更多...
   论坛精华荟萃 更多...
   博客热门文章 更多...


海归网二次开发,based on phpbb
Copyright © 2005-2024 Haiguinet.com. All rights reserved.