海归网首页   海归宣言   导航   博客   广告位价格  
海归论坛首页 会员列表 
收 藏 夹 
论坛帮助 
登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 论坛首页 |  排行榜  |  在线私聊 |  专题 | 版规 | 搜索  | RSS  | 注册 | 活动日历
主题: [zt] Forbes Newsletter: Why Aren't Consumers Buying Lexmark?
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归商务           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙
  阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题
作者 [zt] Forbes Newsletter: Why Aren't Consumers Buying Lexmark?   
hwarrensen
[博客]
[个人文集]




头衔: 海归少将

头衔: 海归少将
声望: 专家

加入时间: 2004/02/22
文章: 1961

海归分: 300133





文章标题: [zt] Forbes Newsletter: Why Aren't Consumers Buying Lexmark? (1799 reads)      时间: 2005-11-03 周四, 04:54   

作者:hwarrensen海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com

Why Aren't Consumers Buying Lexmark?
https://www.forbes.com/2005/10/27/lexmark-printers-inkjet_cx_dl_1028lexmark.html?partner=technology_newsletter


Danit Lidor, 10.28.05, 1:45 PM ET


NEW YORK - What’s wrong with Lexmark?

For its third quarter, ended Sept. 30, revenue at the Lexington, Ky.-based printer maker fell 4%, year-on-year, to $1.22 billion. Not so good. But look at profits, and things get really ugly. On a per-share basis, Lexmark’s (nyse: LXK - news - people ) profits fell nearly 50% from a year ago. Not surprisingly Lexmark has been taking it in the shares, currently trading at around $41, off $50, or 55% from its 52-week high of $90.50.

And while the printer market is indeed maturing, things at competitors are a heck of a lot better. For instance, rival Hewlett-Packard (nyse: HPQ - news - people ), which dominates the U.S. market with a 49% share, according to InfoTrends/CAP Ventures, somehow managed to grow its printing and imaging group by 5% in its third quarter.

Lexmark CEO Paul Curlander blames slower consumer demand, but the real reason may be more fundamental: lack of innovation in a cutthroat consumer business. “We’ve been more reactive than proactive,” Curlander admitted to analysts earlier this week.

Analysts are more blunt. “Lexmark needs to come out with new products, sooner rather than later," said FTN Midwest Research analyst Bill Fearnley.

Although Lexmark is increasing its R&D spending--it's spent about $252 million over the last three quarters--that's still just a fraction of the $1 billion spent annually by HP.

Lexmark’s aging tech and limited product line is hurting it where it counts--retail. While Staples (nasdaq: SPLS - news - people ) and Circuit City (nyse: CC - news - people ), both strong Lexmark vendors in the U.S., declined to comment on their handling of the company's printers, visits to both chains in New York City found no Lexmark laser-jet printers on the sales floor--while there were extensive offerings of HP products.

"Anytime you see retailers carrying less of a particular brand, one of the leading reasons is because of less consumer demand," said InfoTrends/CAP Ventures analyst Robert Palmer.

Another issue: Dell (nasdaq: DELL - news - people ). Since 2003, Dell has been bundling Lexmark printers--albeit under the Dell brand--with its new PCs. That was great news for Lexmark, at least for a while. But since ink-jet printers are a razor and razor-blade business model (meaning that the profits are in selling the replacement ink-cartridges, not the printers themselves), Dell doesn’t care if it sells Lexmark’s printers at a loss. Dell can make up the loss--and a lot more--by marking up the ink-cartridges.

"Dell wants a piece of the replacement ink market, and they can afford to sell the printers at a loss," said MTN Midwest Research's Fearnley. "Lexmark has to get the units out there and sell the ink."

While there isn’t much Lexmark can do, at least in the short term, about Dell, it can try to reignite consumer excitement in its own brand. And the company is trying. Curlander said Lexmark is plotting an aggressive advertising campaign this fall. And the company recently announced a new family of $500 or less monochrome and color laser printers aimed at small and medium-sized businesses. These printers are not particularly innovative, but it's a sign to investors that the company is learning from its mistakes.

It better start learning faster. Curlander himself admitted that Lexmark was expecting similar revenue loss next quarter, adding lamely, "But things are not getting worse."

"Lexmark has to run as fast as it can to catch up," Fearnley said.


作者:hwarrensen海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com









相关主题
[zt] Forbes Newsletter: Intel Might B... 海归论坛 2005-11-03 周四, 04:57
[zt] Forbes Newsletter: The Flat Tax ... 海归论坛 2005-11-02 周三, 04:49
Buying signal again for short term tr... 谈股论金 2011-8-30 周二, 04:29
[ZT FORBES] 最宜华人移居的10个国家 美国只占第九位 海归酒吧 2011-8-14 周日, 13:12
[分享]Li Wins PCCW Buyout Ruling as Cou... 海归主坛 2009-4-06 周一, 14:55
Nobody buying stocks anymore? 谈股论金 2008-9-29 周一, 23:35
[新闻]Buffet is buying Goldman Sachs? 海归主坛 2008-9-24 周三, 10:32
Vix is 29 now. I am buying. 海归主坛 2008-7-12 周六, 01:58

返回顶端
阅读会员资料 hwarrensen离线  发送站内短信
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归商务           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, 
   热门标签 更多...
   论坛精华荟萃 更多...
   博客热门文章 更多...


海归网二次开发,based on phpbb
Copyright © 2005-2026 Haiguinet.com. All rights reserved.