海归网首页   海归宣言   导航   博客   广告位价格  
海归论坛首页 会员列表 
收 藏 夹 
论坛帮助 
登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 论坛首页 |  排行榜  |  在线私聊 |  专题 | 版规 | 搜索  | RSS  | 注册 | 活动日历
主题: ZT: More Than Two Cents For China's Tencent
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归商务           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙
  阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题
作者 ZT: More Than Two Cents For China's Tencent   
Joseph




头衔: 海归中校

头衔: 海归中校


加入时间: 2004/04/07
文章: 189

海归分: 34318





文章标题: ZT: More Than Two Cents For China's Tencent (1385 reads)      时间: 2004-7-03 周六, 07:17   

作者:Joseph海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com

More Than Two Cents For China's Tencent
by Perry Wu

Instant Messaging (IM) has been big in China for a long time. With more than 95% penetration for Microsoft's Internet Explorer, this bodes well for the multinational's own MSN IM system. But of all the companies in China poised to take advantage of the IM market, Tencent Holdings Limited is probably in the best position. Partially owned by the South African media group Naspers, Tencent has in the past week raised nearly US$200 million from its heavily over-subscribed Hong Kong IPO.

But this is not just another over-hyped tech company.

The company can claim the largest market share in the IM business in China. As of the end of the first quarter of 2004, the company claimed 291 million registered accounts in China, which is a good quarter of the entire population of the country (if we assume one account per person). How did they leapfrog Microsoft? They got in first, provided better Chinese-language features, and bundled their desktop IM services with mobile short messaging system features before all their competitors.

As with all other companies who depend on China’s two major telecoms (China Mobile and China Unicom), there is a great risk when there are only two companies who hold the keys to the mobile phone highway. China Mobile and China Unicom, have a natural advantage over the hundreds of companies that depend on them for their mobile phone platforms.

However, Tencent seems to have a genuinely good relationship with China Mobile, being chosen as a “best performing partner” for its SMS services. And mobile phone users’ clear preference for using Tencent for IM could make it more difficult for the telecoms to strong-arm Tencent or create IM systems of their own.

Based on a review of Tencent’s financials, the company is doing a lot of other things right. It has a fat profit margin of 44% for the year ended 2003, and the company can boast an exceedingly low debt/equity ration of only 22%. But most notable is the company’s current return on assets of 68%. With that kind of return, it is a wonder the owners of the company will let public shareholders--through its IPO--share the benefits of its profitability. With these kinds of numbers, Naspers should probably have kept the company private and kept the benefits to itself.

Tencent is clearly shareholder-oriented in other ways too. For example, it has publicly stated that it intends to pay dividends on an ongoing basis of at least 10% of its profits.

Most impressive is how Tencent has dealt with its stock options. Companies that issue stock options are often criticized. But don’t misunderstand: there is nothing inherently wrong with issuing stock options. The problem is how companies usually issue them.

The purpose of stock options is to create an incentive for company personnel to work hard and to have a vested stake in the company’s well-being. In most companies, however, it is directors and top management who usually receive the bulk of the options. But directors, who most always have a sizable equity stake in a pre-IPO company, need little further incentive to perform. So it is amazing how many companies issue vast amounts of options to directors as if it were necessary to motivate these people who already might own 10, 20 or 30% of a company. It is not.

It is refreshing that Tencent has issued options, but none to directors. This is the way stock options should be used: reward employees for working at high-risk start-ups, but do not give these to directors.

Perhaps as a result of its Western ownership, Tencent has already shown a knack for good drivers of shareholder wealth. Combine that with a great brand and the explosive growth of IM in China, and that sure sounds like a good story.

作者:Joseph海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com









相关主题
My 2 cents on China, Japan and US 海归论坛 2005-4-19 周二, 02:09
[新闻].爱因斯特中国(IAESTE CHINA)收藏越窑青瓷陈鹏飞大师经典作品 海归茶馆 2020-8-12 周三, 04:47
I traveled across over half of China ... 海归茶馆 2015-1-21 周三, 07:10
[教学]ESL/TOEFL Teachers for Partnershi... 海归招聘 2014-12-09 周二, 03:14
USA/China offer each other 10-year vi... 海归主坛 2014-11-11 周二, 05:25
[原创]Looking for talented STAR Enginee... 海归招聘 2013-12-27 周五, 10:49
[分享]第6届IESF China汽车电子系统解决方案论坛 海归商务 2013-12-07 周六, 01:23
[分享]第6届IESF China汽车电子系统解决方案论坛 海归茶馆 2013-12-07 周六, 01:19

返回顶端
阅读会员资料 Joseph离线  发送站内短信
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归商务           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, 
   热门标签 更多...
   论坛精华荟萃 更多...
   博客热门文章 更多...


海归网二次开发,based on phpbb
Copyright © 2005-2026 Haiguinet.com. All rights reserved.