海归网首页   海归宣言   导航   博客   广告位价格  
海归论坛首页 会员列表 
收 藏 夹 
论坛帮助 
登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 论坛首页 |  排行榜  |  在线私聊 |  专题 | 版规 | 搜索  | RSS  | 注册 | 活动日历
主题: [转帖]小周, 美国什么最赚钱? 黄色产业!
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归茶馆           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙
  阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题
作者 [转帖]小周, 美国什么最赚钱? 黄色产业!   
Diamondhorse

警告次数: 1



头衔: 海归中将

头衔: 海归中将
声望: 博导
性别: 性别:男
加入时间: 2005/11/01
文章: 4896

海归分: 442560





文章标题: [转帖]小周, 美国什么最赚钱? 黄色产业! (3432 reads)      时间: 2011-1-04 周二, 02:18   

作者:Diamondhorse海归茶馆 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com

知道你在学英文, 鼓励一下。 耐心看完。 看不懂, 网上的哥哥姐姐可以教你。
据此文介绍, 美国的黄色产业, 收入超过微软、亚马孙等的总和。落山鸡有全套的产销链。 而且, 合法, 但你要遵守游戏规则, 如, 不要扯上儿童等等。 各城市也有一些限制。 譬如, 你在落山鸡市就不可以实景拍摄那件事。 而要开车出城一点点。
本人在商言商, 不想诲淫诲盗。 还是反对党的领导干部在大庭广众之下, 对央视美女主播霸王硬上弓。
下面是发表在“Science”网站上的夏威夷大学教授的文章。

P*o *r*n: Good for us?

Scientific examination of the subject has found that as the use of p*o *r*n increases, the rate of sex crimes goes down.
© Comstock / Corbis

P*o *r*nography. Most people have seen it, and have a strong opinion about it. Many of those opinions are negative—some people argue that ready access to p r*n*ography disrupts social order, encouraging people to commit rape, sexual assault, and other sex-related crimes. And even if p o r nography doesn’t trigger a crime, they say, it contributes to the degradation of women. It harms the women who are depicted by p*o* rnography, and harms those who do not participate but are encouraged to perform the acts depicted in it by men who are acculturated by it. Many even adamantly believe that p o*r**n ography should become illegal.

Alternatively, others argue that p*o r*n*ography is an expression of fantasies that can actually inhibit sexual activity, and act as a positive displacement for sexual aggression. P*o* r*nography offers a readily available means of satisfying sexual arousal (mas*turbation), they say, which serves as a substitute for dangerous, harmful, and illegal activities.

Some feminists even claim that p*o* r*n*ography can empower women by loosening them from the shackles of social prudery and restrictions.

But what do the data say? Over the years, many scientists have investigated the link between p*o* r*nography (considered legal under the First Amendment in the United States unless judged “obscene”) and sex crimes and attitudes towards women. And in every region investigated, researchers have found that as p*o *r*nography has increased in availability, sex crimes have either decreased or not increased.

It’s not hard to find a study population, given how widespread p*o r*no*gr*aphy has become. The United States alone produces 10,000 p*o*r*nographic movies each year. The Free Speech Coalition, a p*o r*n industry–lobbying group, estimates that adult video/DVD sales and rentals amount to at least $4 billion per year. The Internet is a rich source, with 40 million adults regularly visiting p*o r*n *Web sites, and more than one-quarter of regular users downloading p*o *r*n *at work. And it’s not just men who are interested: Nelsen/Net reports that 9.4 million women in the United States accessed online p o**r*nography Web sites in the month of September 2003. According to the conservative media watchdog group Family Safe Media, the p*o r*n *industry makes more money than the top technology companies combined, including Microsoft, Google, Apple, and Amazon.
No correlation has been found between exposure to p*or*n *and negative attitudes towards women.

To examine the effect this widespread use of p* o r*n *may be having on society, researchers have often exposed people to p*o r*n and measured some variable such as changes in attitude or predicted hypothetical behaviors, interviewed sex offenders about their experience with p* o r*nography, and interviewed victims of sex abuse to evaluate if pornography was involved in the assault. Surprisingly few studies have linked the availability of p o *rn in any society with antisocial behaviors or sex crimes. Among those studies none have found a causal relationship and very few have even found one positive correlation.

Despite the widespread and increasing availability of sexually explicit materials, according to national FBI Department of Justice statistics, the incidence of rape declined markedly from 1975 to 1995. This was particularly seen in the age categories 20–24 and 25–34, the people most likely to use the Internet. The best known of these national studies are those of Berl Kutchinsky, who studied Denmark, Sweden, West Germany, and the United States in the 1970s and 1980s. He showed that for the years from approximately 1964 to 1984, as the amount of p* o*r* nography increasingly became available, the rate of rapes in these countries either decreased or remained relatively level. Later research has shown parallel findings in every other country examined, including Japan, Croatia, China, Poland, Finland, and the Czech Republic. In the United States there has been a consistent decline in rape over the last 2 decades, and in those countries that allowed for the possession of child p*o r*no*graphy, child sex abuse has declined. Significantly, no community in the United States has ever voted to ban adult access to sexually explicit material. The only feature of a community standard that holds is an intolerance for materials in which minors are involved as participants or consumers.

In terms of the use of p*o r*no*graphy by sex offenders, the police sometimes suggest that a high percentage of sex offenders are found to have used p*o *r*nography. This is meaningless, since most men have at some time used p*o r*no*graphy. Looking closer, Michael Goldstein and Harold Kant found that rapists were more likely than nonrapists in the prison population to have been punished for looking at pornography while a youngster, while other research has shown that incarcerated nonrapists had seen more p*o r*no*graphy, and seen it at an earlier age, than rapists. What does correlate highly with sex offense is a strict, repressive religious upbringing. Richard Green too has reported that both rapists and child molesters use less p*o r*no*graphy than a control group of “normal” males.

Now let’s look at attitudes towards women. Studies of men who had seen X-rated movies found that they were significantly more tolerant and accepting of women than those men who didn’t see those movies, and studies by other investigators—female as well as male—essentially found similarly that there was no detectable relationship between the amount of exposure to p*o r*no*graphy and any measure of misogynist attitudes. No researcher or critic has found the opposite, that exposure to p*o* r*nography—by any definition—has had a cause-and-effect relationship towards ill feelings or actions against women. No correlation has even been found between exposure to p*o r*n and calloused attitudes toward women.

There is no doubt that some people have claimed to suffer adverse effects from exposure to p o*r*nography—just look at testimony from women’s shelters, divorce courts and other venues. But there is no evidence it was the cause of the claimed abuse or harm.

Ultimately, there is no freedom that can’t be and isn’t misused. This can range from the freedom to bear arms to the freedom to bear children (just look at “Octomom”). But it doesn’t mean that the freedom of the majority should be restricted to prevent the abuses of the few. When people transgress into illegal behavior, there are laws to punish them, and those act as a deterrent. In the United States, where one out of every 138 residents is incarcerated, just imagine if p *o* rnography were illegal—there’d be more people in prison than out.

Adapted from “P* o*-rnography, Public Acceptance and Sex Related Crime: A Review,” Int J Law Psychiatry, 32:304–14, 2009. https://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/2005to2009/2009-p*o r*nography-acceptance-crime.html

Milton Diamond is a professor in the department of anatomy, biochemistry and physiology at the University of Hawaii and director of the Pacific Center for Sex and Society.

作者:Diamondhorse海归茶馆 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com









相关主题
[问题]不懂就问,出国能带多少钱? 海归茶馆 2007-4-04 周三, 03:54
六月,除了植物宠物,还有什么能赚钱? 创业园区 2011-7-06 周三, 16:40
六月,除了植物宠物,还有什么能赚钱? 创业园区 2011-6-29 周三, 17:25
[转帖] 刘晓博 美国经济,疯了! 海归商务 2014-12-29 周一, 21:28
[转帖]海归网上不少兄弟都认识这位, 美国证监委起诉并冻结该公司资产 海归主坛 2014-3-30 周日, 12:33
[转帖] 北京对美国要求太低。 应该促美收回疏球群岛和钓鱼岛管理权,并将其... 海归主坛 2012-9-19 周三, 06:12
[转帖]美国《新闻周刊》--在中国人眼中,美国彻底输了 海归茶馆 2011-8-10 周三, 23:53
[转帖]今天的美国其实也很开放,总统可以被骂, 请看: 海归商务 2011-4-15 周五, 11:58

返回顶端
阅读会员资料 Diamondhorse离线  发送站内短信
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归茶馆           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, 
   热门标签 更多...
   论坛精华荟萃 更多...
   博客热门文章 更多...


海归网二次开发,based on phpbb
Copyright © 2005-2024 Haiguinet.com. All rights reserved.