| 作者 |
 李开复跳槽Google 据传猎头收费巨额美元--zt |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
李开复跳槽Google 据传猎头收费巨额美元--zt -- 老刀 - (3587 Byte) 2005-7-25 周一, 10:38 (2231 reads) |
seattle
[博客]
[个人文集]
头衔: 海归准将
声望: 学员
加入时间: 2004/02/26
文章: 1377
海归分: 150911
|
|
|
作者：seattle 在 海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
1. I have worked extensively with head hunters in China, and I know the policies of large US companies and the charging fees of headhunters. Although a position like this is likely to inccur exceptions in fees, my estimate is anywhere around half a year of income of this position. A very simple question to ask is, if Google presents 130 million to Li, Li would happily take the position without any help from the head hunter. In other words, the whole value of Li is not worth that much, then will Google pay that much to a head hunter?
In the State of Washington, non-competitive employement contract may not be effective in the court -- it all depends on the specific terms of the contract (its conditions and consequencies etc) and the specific position and tasks that the employee switch to in a competitor company. There have been many cases in this regard and legal advice is easily available -- Li and Google cannot be possibly that stupid.
In a world, this is just some simple hype from those who entertain themselves in writing fictitious stories.
作者：seattle 在 海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
|
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
|
-
 李开复跳槽Google 据传猎头收费巨额美元--zt -- 老刀 - (3587 Byte) 2005-7-25 周一, 10:38 (2231 reads) - Pure Hype: 1. 130 million is just fiction; 2. employement contract may not be legally binding -- seattle - (1069 Byte) 2005-7-26 周二, 09:32 (318 reads)
- 得一恩顶! -- 疑似公民 - (0 Byte) 2005-7-25 周一, 12:18 (226 reads)
|
|
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, |
|
|
