| 作者 |
 安氏商业评论：如果美国的可口可乐与百事可乐合并，是不是也要报中国的商务部批准？ |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
安氏商业评论：如果美国的可口可乐与百事可乐合并，是不是也要报中国的商务部批准？ -- 安普若 - (324 Byte) 2009-3-24 周二, 00:21 (3830 reads) |
zym1978
头衔: 海归少尉
声望: 学员
加入时间: 2006/11/22
文章: 24
海归分: 2801
|
|
|
作者：zym1978 在 海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
it really depends on whether the chinese government has been granted the jurisdiction under the anti-trust law over the activities at issue. If the jurisdiction has been granted, it surely has the power to intervene, from the perspective of the law in China.
In theory this means the Chinese government has the power to regulate, if jurisdiction is granted, any activities of any companies in the world. And that seems to be troubling you. But in practice this will not happen because (1) if a company is not in china AND the company's activities has no connection to china, there is no way the government can enforce its rulings upon the company; (2) because of (1), normally the government will not be granted jurisdiction too broad to make the enforcement plainly impossible(otherwise it only makes the government look stupid). As a result, there often will be a "link" for the jurisdiction, i.e., something that makes the enforcement possible. Here it is easy for the Chinese government to enforce because both Coke and Huiyuan have substantial operations there.
technically speaking, FCPA is a law trying to regulate the activities of foreign companies in a foreign country. The activities normally are done by a foreign corporation (normally a foreign subsidiary of the U.S. company) in a foreign country, but the U.S. government nevertheless has the jurisdiction to regulate.
作者：zym1978 在 海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
|
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, |
|
|
